Railway alignments,
designed, checked, delivered.
Give it two points on a map. It finds the corridor, designs the geometry, checks it against your standard, and hands you the drawings.
Then you take over. Every point can be dragged in plan and in profile, every value overridden. The automatic pass is a starting point, not an answer.
Foundation for Railway Innovation
Accelerate planning, simulation, structural design, and cost estimation across complex global terrains in one unified CAD platform.
Two pins in. A design package out.
Three steps. Everything between them is automatic.
Drop two pins
30 m terrain arrives for the whole corridor. Anywhere on Earth.
It designs itself
Route, curves, cant, grades, yards, bridges — then checks all of it.
Take the drawings
5 km sheets, DXF, LandXML, Excel, KML. Ready to issue.
Fourteen weeks of drafting, gone.
Move the slider to your next corridor and see what it costs today.
How this is calculated
Conventional preliminary design effort, per route kilometre:
- Corridor & options study0.30 d/km
- Horizontal & vertical geometry, iterated0.45 d/km
- Standards compliance checking0.18 d/km
- 5 km Plan & Profile sheet drafting0.24 d/km
- Hydrology, catchments & structures0.14 d/km
- Earthwork, quantities & reporting0.14 d/km
- Fixed mobilisation4 d
RAD replaces the production effort with review: 1.5 days of setup and local input, then 0.09 d/km of engineering judgement, adjustment and sign-off. Figures describe a preliminary / reconnaissance design stage, not a detailed project report. Substitute your own rates — the model is written out above so you can argue with it.
The problems that eat your week.
Solved on screen, live. Pick one.
Bridge spans from real catchments, not guesswork
Drag the basin area. The structure resizes itself.
It finds what is wrong. Then fixes it.
Every curve, transition, gradient and vertical curve, against the active standard — in a sentence, not a code.
IP2: cant deficiency 150.7 mm exceeds the maximum 100 mm at 120 km/h. Raise the cant or ease the radius.
Press Fix and it repairs, re-solves, and keeps going until the design is clean. Where only your judgement will do, it stops and says so.
Watch it repair 22 errorsIP2: cant deficiency 150.7 mm exceeds the maximum 100 mm at 120 km/h. Raise the cant or ease the radius.
CANT_DEF · 2+140.0IP1 and IP2 are 608 m apart. At 120 km/h two such curves need 682 m between them.
IP_OVERLAP · move the points, or drop to 110 km/hV1 overlaps the exit transition of IP1 — twisting the track while the cant is running out.
V_ON_TRANS · 1+404.8Everything you would have drawn by hand.
5 km Plan & Profile sheet packages
Plan strip, 7-row L-Section grid, curve boxes, title blocks.
Open in the sheet viewer →Station yard layouts
Loops, sidings, turnouts, platforms, SOD 1:400 plateaus.
Explore a yard layout →Eight-sheet workbook
Setting-out, curves, structures, cut & fill, land, compliance.
8 sheets · mass-haul balance · acquisition pegsStraight into Civil 3D
Also OpenRail and 12d Model. Spirals intact.
Google Earth 3D model
Rail ribbon, km posts, yard footprints. For the client meeting.
Hydrology & crossing schedules
Catchments, waterway openings, ROB/RUB registers.
Real corridors. One click each.
Opens in the designer. Drag anything.
Mixed Terrain Study
- 10 km on a real ground survey
- 1 in 105 grades · 2 viaducts
Tohana – Fatehabad Plains
- 50 km · 110 km/h · 3 curves
- Flattest grade 1 in 605
Beed – Kalamb Plateau
- 55 km · 1 in 101 ruling grade
- Viaducts and tunnels proposed
Metro — Depot to Riverside
- 250 m minimum radius
- 1 in 80 grade · 60 km/h
320 km/h Mainline
- 7,500 m radii
- Kilometre-long vertical curves
Departures Demo
- 22 compliance errors
- Press Fix all and watch
Try it on a corridor you already know.
Two places on a map. Sixty seconds. Then judge it.
✦ Design a routePreliminary design, not a DPR. Terrain is 30 m public SRTM — good for corridors, not for pegging. Where the numbers come from →